Casino Rating is an aggregated score based on a comprehensive analysis of a casino’s strengths and weaknesses. It reflects overall player satisfaction and is assigned by our expert review team after evaluating all key factors.
| Name | Points | Description |
| Extremely Low | 0–5 | No trust signals: missing or invalid license, serious payout complaints, opaque terms, high player risk. |
| Very Low | 6–10 | Major reputation issues, unstable withdrawals, weak support, misleading or aggressive bonus practices. |
| Low | 11–15 | Minimal reliability, frequent restrictions, poor UX, negative payment signals or weak brand background. |
| Significantly Below Average | 16–20 | Operational but clearly flawed: slow withdrawals, low limits, very low player interest. |
| Below Average | 21–25 | Limited games and payments, basic licensing, low player engagement, weak repeat registrations. |
| Moderately Low | 26–30 | Basic functionality without strengths: standard bonuses, slow support, low market visibility. |
| Weak | 31–35 | Meets minimum obligations but lacks appeal: average security, limited withdrawals, low conversion. |
| Borderline Weak | 36–40 | Acceptable operation, but low trust from experienced players and weak long-term signals. |
| Average | 41–45 | Market average: valid license, stable payouts, no standout advantages or innovations. |
| Satisfactory | 46–50 | Acceptable level of trust: standard conditions, fair gameplay, reasonable player conversion. |
| Slightly Above Average | 51–55 | Better than market baseline: usable platform, fair bonuses, consistent payment processing. |
| Fairly Good | 56–60 | Balanced reliability and usability: reasonable withdrawal speeds, clear rules, positive feedback. |
| Good | 61–65 | Solid casino: stable operations, healthy player base, decent limits and customer support. |
| Above Average | 66–70 | Stronger than most competitors: reputable license, good conversion rates, broad payment options. |
| Very Good | 71–75 | High trust level: fast withdrawals, transparent bonuses, strong player retention. |
| Strong | 76–80 | Well-established brand: high popularity, consistent growth, minimal unresolved complaints. |
| Very Strong | 81–85 | Excellent platform quality: strong UX, clear policies, high player satisfaction. |
| High | 86–90 | Category leaders: excellent conversion, reliable payments, strong brand recognition. |
| Very High | 91–95 | Premium tier: outstanding reputation, fast payouts, loyal and active player base. |
| Extremely High | 96–100 | Top-tier industry benchmark: maximum trust, exceptional stability, long-term player confidence. |