the United States
GS Rank shows a casino's position in our traffic chart. A lower GS Rank means a more popular casino.
We categorize casinos by estimated monthly popularity — from newcomers to industry leaders — to give you a quick view of how well-known and visited each one is.
| Popularity Categories | Monthly Visits Range |
| Barely Known | 0 – 999 |
| Little Known | 1,000 – 9,999 |
| Emerging | 10,000 – 49,999 |
| Moderately Popular | 50,000 – 199,999 |
| Growing Fast | 200,000 – 999,999 |
| Popular | 1,000,000 – 4,999,999 |
| Very Popular | 5,000,000 – 14,999,999 |
| Top Tier | 15,000,000 – 29,999,999 |
| Super Popular | 30,000,000 – 59,999,999 |
| Legendary | 60,000,000+ |
EnergyCasino is a well-established online casino brand that has been operating on the market for many years and holds a stable position among licensed operators. The platform is known for its extensive bonus system and long-term presence in the iGaming industry.
EnergyCasino offers one of the richest promotional line-ups on the market, including: Welcome Bonus, Reload Bonuses, Free Spins, Cashback, tournaments, EnergyPoints rewards, and task-based promotions. The bonus ecosystem is designed for both new and returning players.
EnergyCasino works with a small number of game providers. However: • Live dealer games are not available • The slots library is relatively small compared to major multi-brand casino platforms.
During our analysis of the payment infrastructure, we found that: • Cryptocurrency payments are not supported • Only fiat-based payment methods (bank cards and e-wallets) are available.
EnergyCasino applies standard KYC procedures and email verification for accounts. At the same time: • SMS verification is not used as an additional security layer.
EnergyCasino is a stable and time-tested casino with a strong bonus ecosystem and a broad provider network. Its main limitations are the lack of crypto payments, no live casino section, no SMS verification, and a limited slots portfolio.
Casino Roaring 21 currently has no open complaints.
Anything incorrect or missing?
